【ただひたすら書き込むスレ】

89fe01dd anonymous 2017-05-27 19:51
>>7ecef6bb
スーパーに行ったら置いてあった。
カールは見なかったなあ。
851123c9 anonymous 2017-05-27 21:16
確かに販売努力が足りてなかったかもしらんね
コラボとか期間限定フレーバーとか

まあ注力商品じゃなかったってことなのこな
c240a820 anonymous 2017-05-27 21:40
>>851123c9
いやいやカールおじさんは企業のコーポレントアイデンテテーだから
単に企業の戦略の失敗

東ハトのキャラメルコーンは大成功した。
b9c569d4 anonymous 2017-05-27 22:02
>>c240a820
その割にチョコレートのCMばっかりだったような気がする
1d1aa056 anonymous 2017-06-01 00:04
2017-06-01
48c5e3eb anonymous 2017-06-07 13:19
来週月曜の面接で今後の人生が決まる
絶対に内定取りたい
68a7b2b5 anonymous 2017-06-10 11:40
LANケーブルを自作しようとしてRJ-45コネクタを買い忘れる夢を見た
bb6cbfde anonymous 2017-06-10 12:12
最近は売り手市場だそうで、羨ましいです。
>>48c5e3eb
e9fd99f8 anonymous 2017-06-10 13:14
5月までに内々定取った人の半分が就活継続らしいので、月末以降は辞退ラッシュが見られそうです
無い内定の自分には羨ましい限り
096928a5 anonymous 2017-06-10 13:39
https://twitter.com/nittaryo/status/870074895329144832
cd2c9603 anonymous 2017-06-10 14:23
今って内定は何段階くらいあんの？
内々々定くらいはあるでしょ？
5341aff9 anonymous 2017-06-10 15:09
そんなの内々々
282fad7c anonymous 2017-06-10 15:12
氷河期に入社して、中年で首を来らて、どこも雇ってくれない、おじさんからみたら、
羨ましくてしょうがない。
eb42e185 anonymous 2017-06-10 15:15
>>68a7b2b5
最近は自作ってどうなの？ 転送レートが上がって自作は怖いんだけど
f8f4d2d9 anonymous 2017-06-10 15:17
>>096928a5
50〜1000人程度の企業に応募してるけど、第一志望は300人強
でも電機メーカーだから電気科の競争率高い・・・
203e7577 anonymous 2017-06-10 16:34
無い内定
内々定
語呂は同じでも意味が違う
30fd391d anonymous 2017-06-10 21:39
オープンソースソフトウェアのライフサイクルと同じくらい時期がわからん
90d44ce1 Carloscar [adkins-8312@mail.ru] 2017-06-15 01:04
?Sample essay
The remainder of this essay crafting tutorial is influenced by a short sample 'divorce essay' (about 1,000 words).
To finish all for the associated tasks, it is easiest if you happen to have the sample essay in front of you.
A major change that has occurred while in the Western family is undoubtedly an increased incidence in divorce. Whereas within the past, divorce was a relatively rare occurrence, in recent times it has become rather commonplace. This change is borne out clearly in census figures. For example thirty years ago in Australia, only a person marriage in ten ended in divorce; nowadays the figure is in excess of a particular in three (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996: p.45). A consequence of this change appears to have been a substantial increase while in the selection of one parent families and then the attendant problems that this brings (Kilmartin, 1997).
An important issue for sociologists, and indeed for all of society, is why these changes in marital patterns have occurred. On this essay I will seek to critically examine quite a lot of sociological explanations for your 'divorce phenomenon' and also consider the social policy implications that just about every explanation carries with it. It will be argued that the optimal explanations are to be found inside a broad socio-economic framework.
Just one type of explanation for rising divorce has focused on changes in laws relating to marriage. For example, Bilton, Bonnett and Jones (1987) argue that increased rates of divorce do not necessarily indicate that families are now alot more unstable. It is conceivable, they claim, that there has always been a degree of marital instability. They suggest that changes within the law have been significant, basically because they have provided unhappily married couples with 'obtain to the legal remedy to pre-existent marital problems' (p.301). Bilton et al. therefore believe that changes in divorce rates tend to be easiest explained in terms of changes inside legal strategy. The problem with this type of explanation however, is the fact it does not consider why these laws have changed with the to begin with put. It could be argued that reforms to family law, at the same time given that the increased rate of divorce that has accompanied them, are the product of way more fundamental changes in society.
Another type of explanation is a person that focuses precisely on these broad societal changes. For example, Nicky Hart (cited in Haralambos, 1995) argues that increases in divorce and marital breakdown are the result of economic changes that have affected the family. Just one example of these changes is the raised material aspirations of families, which Hart suggests has put pressure on both equally spouses to become wage earners. Women as a result have been forced to become both equally homemakers and economic providers. According to Hart, the contradiction of these two roles has lead to conflict and this is the main cause of marital breakdown. It would appear that Hart's explanation cannot account for all cases of divorce - for example, marital breakdown is liable to occur in families where only the husband is working. Nevertheless, her tactic, which is to relate changes in family relations to broader social forces, would seem to be to be increased probing than a particular that looks only at legislative change.
The two explanations described previously mentioned have very different implications for social policy, particularly in relation to how the problem of increasing marital instability may be dealt with. Bilton et al. (1995) offer a legal explanation and hence would see the solutions also being determined in this particular domain. If rises in divorce are thought to be the consequence of liberal divorce laws, the obvious way to stem this rise is to make them less obtainable. This tactic, one particular imagines, would lead into a reduction in divorce statistics; however, it cannot really be held up as a genuine answer to the problems of marital stress and breakdown in society. Indeed it would appear to be a method directed added at symptoms than addressing fundamental causes. Furthermore, the adventure of social workers, working with the area of family welfare suggests that restricting a couple's accessibility to divorce would in some cases serve only to exacerbate present marital problems (Johnson, 1981). In those cases where violence is involved, the consequences could be tragic. Apart from all this, returning to a whole lot more restrictive divorce laws looks to be a choice minimal favoured by Australians. (Harrison, 1990).
Hart (cited in Haralambos, 1995), crafting from the Marxist-feminist position, traces marital conflict to changes while in the capitalist economic strategy and their resultant effect around the roles of men and women. It is difficult to know however, how these an analysis can be translated into practical social policies. This is on the grounds that the Hart program would appear to require on the earliest position a radical restructuring in the economic strategy. Whilst this may be desirable for some, it is not really achievable inside of the existing political climate. Hart is right however, to suggest that a lot of marital conflict could very well be linked in some way to the economic circumstances of families. This is borne out in a number of statistical surveys which indicate consistently that rates of divorce are higher among socially disadvantaged families (McDonald, 1993). This situation suggests then that social policies really need to be geared to providing aid and security for these varieties of families. It is minimal cause for optimism however, that in recent years governments of all persuasions have proven an increasing reluctance to fund social welfare programs of this kind.
It is difficult to offer a comprehensive explanation with the growing trend of marital breakdown; and it is even a whole lot more difficult to choose solutions that may ameliorate the problems created by it. Clearly though, as I have argued with this essay, one of the most useful answers are to be found not inside of a narrow legal framework, but inside of a broader socio-economic an individual.
Finally, it is worth pointing out that, whilst we may appear to be living in the time of increased family instability, research suggests that historically, instability may have been the norm rather than the exception. As Bell and Zajdow (1997) point out, during the past, one parent and step families have been even more commonplace than is assumed - although the disruptive influence then was not divorce, but the premature death of a single or both equally parents. This situation suggests that in studying the fashionable family, a particular needs to employ a historical perspective, such as the possibility of searching to the past in searching for ways of dealing with problems during the current.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1996). Divorces, Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Provider.
Bell, R. and G. Zajdow (1997) Family and household. In R. Jureidini, S. Kenny and M. Poole (eds). Sociology: Australian Connections. St Leonards. NSW: Allen and Unwin
Bilton, T. K. Bonnett and P. Jones (1987). Introductory Sociology. 2nd edition. London: MacMillan.
Haralambos, M. (1995). Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. 3rd edition. London: Bell and Hyman.
Harrison, M. (1995). Grounds for divorce. Family Matters. No 42 pp 34-35.
Johnson, V. (1981). The Last Resort: A Women's Refuge. Ringwood: Penguin.
Kilmartin, C. (1997). Children divorce and one-parent families. Family Matters. No. 48. ( Available in the market On-line )
McDonald, P. (1993). Family Trends and Structure in Australia. Australian Family Briefings No 3. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
9eb28675 anonymous 2017-06-16 02:34
テステス
839a2bcb anonymous 2017-06-16 10:10
>>9eb28675
[[テスト]]
855247cc anonymous 2017-06-21 13:30
国民は適切な手続きで法の改廃を直接的ないし間接的に行えるという民主国家
その民主国家で国民の定義は法によってなされるというのは循環論法になるのではないか？
法によって国民が任命され法によって任命された国民によって法としての正当性が認めらえている国籍法
法が不変の真理でない事は法の改廃が行える事で分かるが、という事は本来なら国民として含められるべき人達ないし本来なら国民として認めてはいけない人達が法によって国民として排除ないし任命されていたとしたら？
循環論法によらず"国民を任命する何らかのもの"を認めるというのは、国民よりも上位の何かを認めるわけで民主国家とうものの否定にならないか？
客観的な基準で解決するかな？
でもその客観的な基準は誰が決めるのかな？
ea2ed9f5 anonymous 2017-06-21 20:58
循環論法という言葉の使い方が意味不明すぎるなあ

ともかく、権利の正当性は現在の国民から国籍法改定によって新たに選ばれた国民へ、現在の国民の権利行使をもって移管されただけだろう
あと「本来」ってどっから出てきたんだ
国民によって決められた法が国民の定義を行う、これ以外に適切な「国民の定義」があるという仮定がそもそも民主主義の前提と対立してる
a9ead448 Williamsam [green-1955@mail.ru] 2017-06-23 03:21
?Uncover the preferred essay writer on your assignment!
Producing academic papers is definitely an irreplaceable part for the life of every student. Whether you will be in college or university, producing an assignment is difficult. It takes a lot of time and effort. Why not order it from an essay by going online composing program. A great many students come to the understanding that this may be the answer to a lot of their problems.
You may be wondering if it is plausible to locate a web site that would connect you with essay writers willing to do your assignment? “Who on Earth would create my paper for me?” - you ask. Do not worry, as we have the option: the optimal essay producing program is prepared to offer its companies.
What people are saying
This is how it really works:
You send us the assignment and leave a message that says something like: "Would you compose my essay for me?"
We routine the important information and pick a writer that may be qualified to help you.
You relax although the paper is being written.
You obtain the paper before the deadline and make some remarks if necessary.
We are happy to offer our essay writer companies considering the fact that we do understand how considerably you value your time. We have all been students and we nonetheless remember that 24 hours is barely enough to do everything just one wants to. Let us take the burden of creating from you! Send us a "Write my essay" request and we will do everything we can to help you.
You may wonder whether or not our provider will be able to deliver a very high superior product for you. We are certain that our qualified writers are capable of composing any essay. Given our vast encounter, we know how to accomplish the optimum result and have tested our methods on numerous occasions.
Composing an essay may raise substantial problems, mainly for inexperienced writers.
Substantial excellent quality help from professional essay writers
So, what different rates our paper writer from an average using the web writers. To begin with, we hire only those who have vast adventure around the subject: at least three years. We believe that this period of time helps a person to determine whether or not they will pursue this career or not.
Secondly, we have a state for the art High quality Assurance Program. Every essay that's sent to our people undergoes numerous checks. This signifies that it is absolutely impossible to acquire a bad paper from us. The two content and spelling are perfect, let alone formatting. Our writers know that every single educational facility has unique standards for essays, and they never violate them.
Thirdly, you should not forget about the fact that you simply will be in charge within the producing approach of your essay from the beginning to the conclusion. This suggests that if you ever come up with certain suggestions regarding the paper, they will be considered right absent. Due into a highly responsive communication structure, our writers will be able to incorporate all of your suggestions right absent.
We are willing to tackle any assignment that you choose to give you. Is it not composing an essay from scratch you are seeking, but rewriting? We can do that at the same time. Do you absolutely need a lab report? We can do that too! Is there a desire for creative composing? Our writers will do anything to deliver your paper, regardless of its type.
Finally, we have a very special provider that we would like to offer. Our writers are not only proficient at composing essays, but can do software letters, CV or any other document that you choose to may would need. The excellent of this services is exemplary. After ordering a CV from us, you will never like to use another agency again.
Benefits of working with our producing provider
We offer competitive prices. Obviously, a person can discover a program that will publish an essay for less, but can this agency guarantee the same amount of high quality? Our research shows that it cannot. Every now and then it is far better to pay back slightly a whole lot more and be assured that the essay will be outstanding.
At no cost revisions. In some cases the professors may introduce added needs you may not have known in the event you placed the order to your essay. By no signifies is this a problem! Our writers will be happy to entire any kind of revision inside of the given period. This suggests that for those who have any comments about the essay, you happen to be 100 percent free to make them and we will make sure that the paper is nothing but perfect.
The reference web site is really an important part of any paper, however it is often overlooked. We guarantee you will not really need to shell out for it. Yes, you heard us right: we will give you an entire web page for you for free of cost since we want you to definitely enjoy our program.
Communication is extremely important on the world of education. That's why our guidance team is the perfect with the industry. You’re able to ask our experts anything and be assured that they will reply as soon as doable. No deadlines will be missed as of failures in communication. We are always there for you and will never let you down with your essay.
Our biggest advantage tends to be that all our paper are 100% original. Over the years, we have worked with numerous students, but our writers have never submitted two essays that are alike. This way you could potentially know for sure that no professor has ever seen the essay that you simply are about to post. We will do our most advantageous to exceed your expectations!
f0b54cbb anonymous 2017-06-27 21:36
やっほーーーーーーー！（ストレス発散）
67c5cf2f anonymous 2017-06-28 08:48
おはよう（まだ出勤してない）
1c5995f3 anonymous 2017-07-01 00:03
7月になってしまった
20708435 anonymous 2017-07-01 00:20
ほんとだことしもあと半年
4d6a5941 anonymous 2017-07-21 04:21
>>1b6d00f4
ブラック企業なんていわれている企業は、ただ単に市場における労働の価値を適正にしようとする圧力の一環にすぎんからな
不当に高い賃金を支払わされれば残業でもさせて時間当たりの賃金を適正値にしようとするのも当然
自由市場というのはそういうもんで労働に限定せず不当に高いものや安いものには淘汰圧がかかる
労働者の待遇がどうのなんてのは社会の都合なんだから、そういうのは社会福祉でどうにかする問題で私企業に押し付ける問題じゃない
852aa55c anonymous 2017-07-21 19:04
もし本当に賃金を「適正」にしてるんなら、堂々と賃金が安いことを表示すればいい
違法なサービス残業ではなく正規の残業にできるよ
労働者が寄り付かなくなる? それが自由市場だ

自由市場は競争によって社会の効率を改善するというが
労働市場においてブラック企業はブラックでない企業と競争できてないんだよ
不効率な経営を労働者からの不当な搾取でごまかしているだけ
方や、法を遵守し効率化を行って踏ん張っている企業がある
どっちが社会に有用かわかるね
9ad9ec60 anonymous 2017-07-30 21:29
>>852aa55c
>もし本当に賃金を「適正」にしてるんなら、堂々と賃金が安いことを表示すればいい
>違法なサービス残業ではなく正規の残業にできるよ
公表すれば労基法の規定を無視していいというのはないんじゃないの？
だから建前としては最低限を守りつつ、サービス残業や自爆営業を駆使して実質的に適正な扱いにしようとしているのだし

>労働者が寄り付かなくなる? それが自由市場だ
普通に寄り付くよ
だからブラック企業と呼ばれる企業は存在してるし、人間も入ってきているわけで
そうでないなら淘汰されてるでしょ

>自由市場は競争によって社会の効率を改善するというが
>労働市場においてブラック企業はブラックでない企業と競争できてないんだよ
>不効率な経営を労働者からの不当な搾取でごまかしているだけ
>方や、法を遵守し効率化を行って踏ん張っている企業がある
前提がおかしいよ
全ての人が政治的に決められた最低限の待遇を得られる能力があるわけじゃない
そういう企業は単に最低限以上の待遇が正当な労働者を選別しているだけ
その踏ん張っている企業だってホームレスといった長期に渡って職歴のない人は雇わないでしょ
選別と排除が適切に機能しているのは良いけど、その選別と排除で零れ落ちた人はどうなんの？

>どっちが社会に有用かわかるね
労働者たる資格なしとして零れ落ちた人は本来なら社会福祉で面倒を見るのが筋だけど、社会が面倒を見ないからブラック企業と呼ばれている集団が面倒を見てんじゃないの？
かといって普通に生活もできないからBIや半BIをという事だけど
BI的なものを採用すれば最低限はちゃんと守られるし、だからこそ、それを下回る労働環境は市場のルールによって淘汰される

いわゆるブラック企業問題は負担を回避したいが為に営利法人を悪者にして負担を集中させる事の歪み
社会の一部である営利法人に負担を求めるのは正しいけど、負担を集中させるのは不当
自由市場を必要悪として肯定する以上は、可能な限り効率的に動いてもらわなければ肯定する意味もないし
77d342f2 JimmiXzSqc [jimosa45812rt1@hotmail.com] 2017-07-31 00:16
y4Ctjp http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
f2ebd147 anonymous 2017-08-01 00:00
2017-08-01
43296e85 anonymous 2017-09-01 00:00
2017-09-01
cbcfa4b9 anonymous 2017-09-01 01:05
月初めに書き込むBOT？
8d267bfd anonymous 2017-09-14 18:29
EVの普及とともにリチウムイオン電池が高騰し、我々の家庭にも影響が出る
9d71bf03 anonymous 2017-10-01 16:48
>>6b2b940b
[[テスト]]
b5bbba6a anonymous 2017-10-05 16:34
全知全能の神が統治してくれるでも、高度に発達したAIによる統治でもいいけど、国民が国家権力の意思決定に参加しないのが最適解となる状態で、国民は国家という概念を持ち帰属意識を持てるだろうか？
外国が存在していれば概念は持ち得るけど、言われた事をするだけだから帰属意識は持てないのじゃないの？
気がかりになり得るのは自分や自分の周囲という国家とは言えない小さな世界だけど、前提が前提だから特に大きな問題も生じないし
世界征服を成し遂げたら国家の概念も持てなくなるのでは？
史学者とかは例外になりそうだけど
e6a5ae93 anonymous 2017-10-05 18:22
何の政治的権利もない中世の兵士は国家に帰属意思を持って戦争に赴いただろう
8d02ea1c anonymous 2017-10-05 18:43
国に帰属意識を持つのであって、権力機構である国家に大抵は帰属意識を持たないのでは？
偏見だけど、アメリカ人は国民主権が機能しないのであれば、国家そのものを破壊してやるって感じじゃね
59274aa4 anonymous 2017-10-06 17:54
>>b5bbba6a
国家が自由を国民に保証するすることで多少なりとも帰属意識は発生するんじゃないか
企業だって従業員に自分のしたいことが出来るといった一定の意思決定権なり裁量権があることによって帰属意識なるものはうまれるわけだし
あるいは自分の面倒を見てくれたという義理とか自分の後継を育ててくれるだろうという安心感がグループが自分たちの仲間であって自分もそれに味方するという意識につながっていくのでは
6e7aa50b anonymous 2017-10-06 18:03
国家に帰属意識があっても国家が国民を裏切れば国民はしだいに帰属意識をすてるとおもう
あなたは国家に帰属意識を持っていますか
c1554bdc anonymous 2017-10-06 20:36
あなたはそこにいますか
df4b074f anonymous 2017-10-09 01:26
大人になったら電卓を使うのに筆算をさせる意味があるのかという疑問は子供ながらに持った
今更ながら大人になってやる計算は合っていればいいもので究極的には人がやる必要も理解する必要もないもの (だからAIがやっても問題ないし将来そうなると思う)
対して学校でやる計算は数論というものを理解させるのが目的
正解しているか否かは理解しているかどうかの指標でしかなく究極的には全問不正解でも理解していれば問題ない (この条件が満たされる得るのかどうかは分からないけど)
9f28eff2 anonymous 2017-10-09 01:38
親がこれらを理解して子供に教えられるかどうかは重要なのではないかと思った
もしも理解せずに無根拠に大事だからで済ませてしまえば子供の疑問に答えたことにはならずに消化不要を起こし分からないまま
最悪圧力を掛けたりすれば自分の感情を押し付けても構わないという事を学びかねない

子供への教育を考えると親というのは壁の様な存在なのだろうな
大概は親と同程度の教育水準で親と同程度の生活水準という感じに世襲していく
上に行ける人もいるだろうけど、アスペとかの障碍者が生まれてくる可能性もあるし、生活水準を基準にするとどちらの要素が上回るか
e48ee945 anonymous 2017-10-09 10:04
>>df4b074f
高級な演算ならまだしも四則演算ぐらいはできないと
でも電卓/PCを使いこなせるよう教育しないと
そろばんの代わりは筆算じゃないからね
d5c470e9 anonymous 2017-10-10 07:03
H2A打ち上げ
ec8c5fea anonymous 2017-10-10 07:31
みちびき4号機打ち上げ成功
36722c34 anonymous 2017-10-10 07:47
日本版GPSとか言われてるけどGじゃないんだよなあ
81d6a474 anonymous 2017-10-10 07:55
昔の中華SoCでQZSS対応とか割と謎だった
5994fb28 anonymous 2017-10-10 08:51
わりとGPSの妨害って戦争じゃ当たり前になってきてるんだよねえ

Top of this page. | <<last <<new 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 old>>

Agreement
limit: 1536KB

(【ただひたすら書き込むスレ】/4020/12.1MB)

Powered by shinGETsu.